
Welcome to Pump.fun!
Pump lets anyone create coins, giving everyone equal access to buy and sell from the start. Prices can move quickly, so trade carefully.
By clicking this button, you agree to the Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy, and certify that you are over 18 years old.
We value your privacy
This site uses cookies to improve your browsing experience, analyze site traffic, and show personalized content.
Coins, livestreams and activity from PonZeus on Pump.fun.

HAGGIS+$4.22Spent $19+22%

OVERMAN−$39.39Spent $50−78%
HOLDER−$130.20Spent $139−94%
callinu−$208.29Spent $300−69%Sign in to see more
Streaks and all-time activity are only shown to signed-in users.
3.8K STONKHeld for $114M MC
I'm incredibly bullish on STONK... it did $1.5M in revenue last week, and $752K of that went straight to holders. The mcap sits at around $100M as of writing. Aave is next to STONK on the protocol leaderboard, and it pulled in $1.19M in the last 7 days. it's valued at $2.48B (!). Jupiter did less revenue than STONK and still carries a billion-dollar mcap. I could go on... That's really the whole story here. we've had a terrible two weeks, weak hands have sold, but the actual revenue this protocol generates didn't change at all. when the price and the fundamentals start pulling in opposite directions like that, especially after a brutal 70% drop, IMO the risk-reward ratio becomes quite exceptional. of course, the bet is that the revenue keeps showing up. That's it. if STONK keeps printing anywhere close to this week after week, $100M is going to look like a ridiculously low mcap in hindsight. If revenue dries up (which is possible, but I just don't see it happening in the medium term), well... the cheap price will turn out to have been cheap for a reason. Anyway, the thesis is simple. DYOR and don't just trust me. go pull the daily revenue numbers yourself, compare it with other top protocols by revenue and mcap, and draw your own conclusion.